Developer Relations (DevRel) has become a strategic function for technology companies worldwide, bridging engineering, product, and external developer communities. As demand for qualified DevRel specialists grows, so do the challenges of hiring and evaluating talent in this hybrid domain. Traditional hiring processes—especially those requiring unpaid “spec work”—often fail to capture the unique blend of technical fluency, empathy, and community-building required for success in DevRel. This article outlines evidence-based approaches to hiring Developer Relations professionals, focusing on humane, competency-driven assessments and practical alternatives to unpaid assignments. Emphasis is placed on processes relevant to global markets (EU, US, LatAm, MENA), balancing the interests of both organizations and candidates.
Understanding Developer Relations: Core Competencies and Role Archetypes
DevRel professionals are not only technical advocates; they are also educators, content creators, community moderators, and feedback channels. According to research by Mary Thengvall (The Business Value of Developer Relations, 2018), effective DevRel functions operate at the intersection of:
- Technical communication (documentation, tutorials, demos)
- Community engagement and moderation
- Product feedback collection and advocacy
- Content creation (writing, speaking, streaming)
- API and SDK empathy
Hiring for DevRel requires distinction between archetypes. For example, a Developer Advocate may focus on enabling external engineers, while a Community Manager addresses moderation, trust, and code of conduct enforcement. Misalignment between job description and actual needs can result in poor quality-of-hire and high turnover.
Competency Models and Frameworks
Competency-based hiring aligns assessment with business outcomes. Behavioral Event Interviewing (BEI) and STAR (Situation-Task-Action-Result) frameworks are recommended for structured evaluation of:
- Technical depth (e.g., experience with APIs, SDKs, developer tools)
- Communication (e.g., clarity in presentations, empathy in feedback channels)
- Community-building (e.g., moderating forums, organizing events, resolving conflict)
- Content strategy (e.g., blog posts, technical guides, videos)
- Metrics orientation (e.g., measuring engagement, tracking adoption)
Scorecards based on these models help mitigate bias and support fair, repeatable evaluation (see: Harvard Business Review, “How to Take the Bias Out of Interviews”, 2016).
Key Metrics in DevRel Hiring
Organizations benefit from aligning their DevRel hiring with measurable outcomes. Common KPI examples and their relevance:
| Metric | Target Range | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Time-to-fill | 4–8 weeks | Longer for senior/technical hybrid roles |
| Time-to-hire | 2–6 weeks | Depends on assessment complexity |
| Quality-of-hire (QoH) | Composite score | Measured at 90 days, includes engagement and impact |
| Offer-accept rate | 60–85% | Lower rates signal process or expectation issues |
| 90-day retention | >90% | Early attrition is costly and often avoidable |
| Candidate response rate | 20–40% | Higher with personalized outreach, especially in DevRel |
Tracking these metrics enables continuous improvement and signals respect for candidates’ time and effort.
Artifacts and Intake: Aligning Expectations from the Start
The intake brief is essential for clarifying what success looks like in a DevRel role. Effective briefs include:
- Key responsibilities (e.g., content pipeline, event moderation, API feedback loop)
- Technical stack and required languages
- Target developer communities (geography, language, experience level)
- Relevant metrics (e.g., monthly active users, feedback volume, NPS)
- Inclusion standards (anti-discrimination, accessibility, code of conduct)
Defining these upfront minimizes later misalignment and offers a foundation for valid assessment.
Scorecards for Structured Interviewing
DevRel scorecards typically cover:
- Technical skills: API literacy, programming background
- Communication: Public speaking, writing samples, moderation style
- Community empathy: Conflict resolution, inclusivity, feedback sophistication
- Strategy: Experience with scaling developer programs, partnership ecosystems
Each criterion is rated (e.g., 1–5) with behavioral anchors, supporting fair comparison and post-interview debrief.
Assessing DevRel Candidates Without Unpaid Spec Work
Why Unpaid Spec Assignments Are Harmful
“Asking candidates to produce free content or moderate communities as part of your hiring process is more likely to alienate top talent than reveal their true abilities. It also raises legal and ethical questions about uncompensated labor.”
— Source: DevRel.net, “Hiring for Developer Relations”
Unpaid work disproportionately excludes those who cannot afford to invest significant hours without compensation, and can even violate basic employment laws in some regions (see: GDPR, EEOC guidelines).
Alternative, Evidence-Based Approaches
- Portfolio Review: Request links to published articles, videos, recorded talks, or open-source contributions. Evaluate for clarity, depth, and community engagement.
- Scenario-Based Interviewing: Present realistic community or API scenarios and discuss how the candidate would respond, using the STAR/BEI frameworks.
- Moderation Simulation (Without Live Community Impact): Pose hypothetical moderation dilemmas or ask for feedback on a sample code of conduct.
- Content Critique: Share a recent blog post or documentation sample from your company. Ask the candidate to review and suggest improvements.
- Paid Trial Projects (if deeper assessment is critical): Offer short, compensated projects such as a guest blog, micro-tutorial, or recorded walk-through. Payment signals respect and reduces risk of exploitation.
These methods provide insight into a candidate’s actual working style and values, without the ethical pitfalls of unpaid labor.
Sample Hiring Workflow and Checklist
- Intake Briefing (Hiring Manager, Recruiter, DevRel team): Define priorities, must-haves, KPIs, and cultural context.
- Application Review: Screen for relevant experience, portfolio, and alignment with core competencies.
- Structured Screening Call: Behavioral questions (STAR/BEI), basic motivation and values check.
- Technical and Community Assessment:
- Portfolio review
- Scenario-based discussion (API empathy, conflict resolution, content feedback)
- Team Debrief: Use scorecards for structured comparison and bias mitigation.
- Offer & Onboarding: Include clarity on expectations and early metrics (e.g., 30/60/90-day plans).
This process is adaptable for scale: larger companies may include panel interviews or asynchronous tasks, while startups can streamline steps but should maintain structured evaluation for fairness.
Mini-Case: Assessing API Empathy and Community Moderation
Scenario: A candidate for a Developer Advocate role is presented with the following situation during an interview:
“A developer on your forum is frustrated with unclear API documentation and has posted a critical comment. How do you respond, and what steps do you take next?”
Effective Candidate Response (using STAR):
- Situation: Criticism on public forum about documentation.
- Task: Address the developer’s concern and improve public perception.
- Action: Respond empathetically in public, acknowledge the feedback, escalate to documentation team, and follow up with updates.
- Result: Developer feels heard; documentation is improved; others see proactive engagement.
Candidates who demonstrate both technical understanding and community empathy are more likely to succeed in DevRel roles. Scorecard anchors for this scenario may include:
- Empathy and professionalism in response
- Clear communication of next steps
- Process for internal escalation and follow-up
- Awareness of public community impact
Counterexample: Risks of Unstructured or Spec-Based Assessment
A US-based startup asked DevRel candidates to write a custom tutorial using their API—without compensation or clear time limits. According to candidate feedback (see: #DevRelJobs), this led to:
- Low offer-accept rates (estimated below 40%)
- Negative employer branding on public forums
- Loss of diverse candidates unable to afford unpaid work
After switching to portfolio review and scenario-based interviews, their time-to-hire improved by 2 weeks and 90-day retention rates increased by 15%.
Global Considerations: Adapting for Region, Scale, and Inclusion
DevRel hiring must be sensitive to regional legal frameworks and cultural expectations. For example:
- EU/UK: GDPR-compliant handling of candidate data is mandatory; transparency on assessment storage is required.
- US: EEOC guidelines demand consistent, non-discriminatory assessment; documentation of scoring processes is recommended.
- LatAm/MENA: Community dynamics and language fluency may carry different weight; localized content review is valuable.
Company size also influences process. Startups may rely more on direct references and practical trials (with compensation), while enterprises should institutionalize structured interviews and clear RACI (Responsible-Accountable-Consulted-Informed) matrices to prevent process drift.
Checklist: Inclusive and Effective DevRel Hiring
- Define clear, realistic job requirements
- Use structured interviews and scorecards
- Respect candidate time—no unpaid assignments
- Prioritize portfolio and scenario-based evaluation
- Compensate for any trial work
- Document and monitor key metrics (QoH, retention, response rates)
- Align selection with regional legal and cultural standards
- Regularly request feedback from both hires and declined candidates
Final Thoughts
DevRel hiring requires more than technical testing or content creation exercises. The most effective processes are humane, structured, and aligned with the real-world impact a candidate will make. Focusing on portfolio review, scenario-based interviews, and paid trial work where necessary not only improves quality-of-hire and retention, but also signals respect for candidates and strengthens employer branding—essential in a highly networked, reputation-driven field.
For further reading, see: