Skills taxonomies have become a cornerstone of modern talent acquisition, workforce planning, and internal mobility. Mapping internal role structures to public taxonomies—such as ESCO (European Skills, Competences, Qualifications and Occupations) and O*NET (Occupational Information Network, US)—enables organizations to benchmark, search, and report on talent needs with greater accuracy and interoperability. This approach also supports compliance with global labor standards and diversity initiatives, while providing candidates with transparent career pathways.
Why Map Internal Roles to Public Taxonomies?
Public taxonomies like ESCO and O*NET provide standardized language and frameworks for describing occupations, skills, and competencies. Their adoption in internal systems is driven by several practical needs:
- Enhanced search and matching: Structured data enables more accurate job-candidate matching within ATS, job boards, and internal mobility platforms.
- Benchmarking and analytics: Standardized roles and skills facilitate cross-company or cross-country benchmarking, and enable robust analytics on workforce composition and skills gaps.
- Mobility and upskilling: Career pathing becomes more transparent when roles and skills are aligned with public frameworks recognized by educational and governmental bodies.
- Compliance: Using established taxonomies supports adherence to anti-discrimination and fair employment standards (e.g., EEOC, GDPR), and helps mitigate bias by relying on objective criteria.
However, mapping is not a one-size-fits-all solution. It requires careful reconciliation between unique organizational structures and the sometimes generic or region-specific categories of public taxonomies.
Overview of ESCO and O*NET
| Aspect | ESCO | O*NET |
|---|---|---|
| Region | EU (multilingual, 27+ countries) | US (English, federal standard) |
| Scope | Occupations, skills, qualifications | Occupations, skills, work activities, interests |
| Updates | Annually, coordinated by European Commission | Ongoing, managed by US Department of Labor |
| Availability | Open data, API, downloadable | Open data, API, downloadable |
| Key Use Cases | EU labor mobility, education, job-matching | US workforce planning, job-matching, analytics |
Both taxonomies are widely integrated into public employment services, commercial HR platforms, and research tools (see: European Commission, 2023; National Center for O*NET Development, 2023).
Mapping Workflow: Step-by-Step
Below is a recommended workflow for mapping internal roles to ESCO and O*NET. While the process can be partially automated using HRIS/ATS integrations or AI-powered parsing tools, human oversight is essential for accuracy and local relevance.
-
Inventory Internal Roles and Skills
- Extract role titles, job families, and associated skills from your HRIS, job descriptions, and competency models.
- Engage relevant stakeholders (HRBPs, hiring managers, business leaders) to validate current role definitions.
-
Normalize and Cleanse Data
- Standardize naming conventions for roles and skills (e.g., “Software Engineer” vs. “Developer”).
- Remove duplicates, outdated roles, and clarify ambiguous titles.
-
Initial Taxonomy Mapping
- Match each internal role to the closest ESCO and O*NET occupation codes. Start with exact matches; if none exist, select the most relevant broader category.
- Use keyword matching, skill overlap, and job function as primary criteria.
- Leverage public APIs or downloadable datasets for bulk mapping where possible.
-
Skills Alignment
- Map internal skill requirements to taxonomy-defined skills. Note mismatches or gaps—some proprietary or emerging skills may not be captured in public frameworks.
- Mark “critical” vs. “nice-to-have” skills to maintain fidelity to business needs.
-
Reconciliation and Review
- Conduct structured debriefs with hiring managers to validate mappings. Use scorecards to document alignment or discrepancies.
- Flag region-specific or unique roles that require custom treatment.
-
Finalization and Integration
- Document mappings (role-to-ESCO/O*NET code, and skill-to-taxonomy skill). Store in your HRIS or reporting layer.
- Update job postings, internal mobility tools, and analytics dashboards to reflect standardized codes and skills.
-
Continuous Updates
- Schedule periodic reviews to capture changes in internal structures or taxonomy updates (annual or semi-annual is typical).
- Solicit feedback from users and candidates to refine relevancy.
Checklist: Mapping Readiness
- Have all current roles and job families been catalogued?
- Is there agreement on terminology and skill definitions?
- Are stakeholders (HR, business leaders, recruiters) aligned on mapping principles?
- Is there an established review cadence for taxonomy updates?
Reconciliation Tips and Pitfalls
The mapping process often reveals gaps and misalignments between internal and public taxonomies. Some common challenges and solutions:
-
Roles Not Present in Taxonomies:
- Emergent or company-specific roles (e.g., “AI Prompt Engineer”) may not exist in ESCO/O*NET.
- Tip: Map to the closest occupational cluster, and document any unique responsibilities separately. Consider submitting feedback to taxonomy maintainers for future inclusion (O*NET regularly updates with industry input).
-
Different Granularity:
- Internal roles may be more specialized or broader than taxonomy categories.
- Tip: Use competency models or skill matrices to bridge levels of detail. For analytics, aggregate to the taxonomy’s standard when reporting externally.
-
Regional or Language Variations:
- ESCO supports multilingual mapping; O*NET is US/English-centric.
- Tip: For global organizations, maintain a crosswalk between ESCO and O*NET codes, and provide local context in job descriptions to avoid misinterpretation.
-
Skills Not Found in Taxonomies:
- Proprietary tools, niche technical skills, or evolving “soft” skills may be missing.
- Tip: Supplement with internal skills libraries, but indicate taxonomy alignment for baseline comparability.
-
Bias and Fairness Considerations:
- Public taxonomies are frequently audited for bias, but internal mapping can unintentionally reinforce stereotypes (e.g., by gendered role titles).
- Tip: Use structured interviews and validated scorecards (e.g., based on STAR/BEI frameworks) to ensure objective evaluation. Regularly audit mapping for fairness, especially when used in automated matching or filtering.
“Taxonomies are living documents—mapping is not a one-time project, but a continuous dialogue between business needs and the evolving world of work. Treat every exception as an opportunity for clarity, not as a problem to hide.”
— Global Talent Intelligence Lead, Technology Sector (2023)
Reporting and Analytics: Examples and Metrics
Once mapping is in place, organizations can unlock richer analytics and reporting. Examples include:
Workforce Skills Gap Analysis
- Identify critical skill shortages by comparing current employee skillsets (tagged to ESCO/O*NET) with future role requirements.
- Visualize gaps by job family, business unit, or region.
Mobility and Diversity Reporting
- Track internal mobility by standardized role codes, revealing bottlenecks or underutilized talent pools.
- Monitor representation and opportunity equity using taxonomy-aligned reporting (e.g., EEOC categories cross-referenced with O*NET roles).
KPI Table: Typical Metrics Enabled by Taxonomy Mapping
| KPI | Description | How Mapping Helps |
|---|---|---|
| Time-to-Fill | Average days to fill an open role | Compare by standardized role codes across regions/departments |
| Quality-of-Hire | Performance and retention of new hires | Benchmark by mapped competency profiles |
| Offer-Accept Rate | Ratio of accepted offers to total offers | Identify patterns in specific ESCO/O*NET roles |
| 90-Day Retention | Percent of hires still employed after 90 days | Correlate with skills alignment at hire |
| Internal Mobility Rate | Percent of internal moves per year | Track by mapped role families for visibility |
Mini-Case: Mapping in Action
Scenario: A multinational manufacturer operates in both Germany and the US and faces challenges aligning engineering roles for cross-country talent mobility. Internal titles such as “Production Automation Specialist” do not directly match O*NET or ESCO roles.
- Action: The HR team inventories the top 50 roles, cleanses titles, and matches them to the nearest ESCO and O*NET codes. Unique roles are mapped to broader categories, with a “local variant” tag for custom reporting.
- Result: Mobility requests increase by 28% as employees can now see standardized career paths in both regions. Time-to-fill drops by 15% due to improved job-matching in the ATS, and diversity reporting is streamlined for both EU and US legal frameworks.
Source: Adapted from case studies by the World Economic Forum (2022) and the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP, 2023).
Integration with Tools and Platforms
Most modern ATS and HRIS platforms offer at least basic support for taxonomy mapping. For organizations with custom or legacy systems, the following practices are recommended:
- Store mapping tables in a central, version-controlled location (HRIS, data warehouse, or secure shared drive).
- Automate updates using APIs where possible, but require manual review for any changes affecting compliance or reporting.
- Leverage AI-powered assistants for bulk keyword matching, but validate final results with human expertise.
- Document mapping logic—especially any exceptions or overrides—for audit and transparency.
For organizations operating across borders, consider maintaining both ESCO and O*NET mappings in parallel, and provide a “crosswalk” for key roles. Open-source projects and industry groups (such as HR Open Standards and the World Employment Confederation) offer resources for maintaining such interoperability.
Practical Trade-Offs and Adaptation
No mapping is perfect. For startups and SMEs, a lightweight approach—focusing on high-volume or critical roles—may suffice. For large enterprises, invest in dedicated HRIS integrations and regular governance reviews. In regions with unique labor markets (e.g., MENA, LatAm), supplement ESCO/O*NET with local frameworks or adapt mappings to fit regulatory requirements.
Be transparent with both employees and candidates about the purpose and limits of taxonomy mapping—especially when used in automated decision-making. Regularly solicit feedback to ensure that frameworks support, rather than hinder, inclusion and growth.
Summary Checklist: Sustainable Skills Mapping
- Inventory and standardize internal roles and skills
- Map to public taxonomies (ESCO, O*NET) using both automation and expert review
- Reconcile gaps and document exceptions
- Integrate mappings into core HR/recruitment tools
- Leverage analytics for workforce planning, mobility, and compliance
- Review and update mappings regularly to reflect business and market changes
Done well, skills taxonomy mapping builds a foundation for better hiring, development, and mobility—connecting the world of work in a way that serves both organizations and individuals.